Turboscribe focuses on generating transcripts from audio. Glyph does that and more — it automatically extracts insights, summarizes content, and detects patterns across large volumes of data. Think of Glyph as a full transcription + AI-powered analysis platform.

Glyph: Yes, you can upload 100+ files in bulk and process them all with custom workflows.

‍Turboscribe: Limited bulk upload support; primarily designed for single or small batch files.

Yes. Glyph gives you full, accurate transcripts for every file. You also get structured summaries, extracted insights, and trend analysis — all in one dashboard.

Glyph: Yes. You can define custom prompts to extract exactly what you need (e.g., action items, product feedback, red flags).
‍
Turboscribe: No. You get a raw transcript with no customizable extraction features.

Glyph: Yes. You can chat directly with any transcript to ask questions like “What were the top objections in this call?” or “Summarize this for legal review.”

‍Turboscribe: No chat or follow-up interaction features.

Glyph supports audio, video, and document uploads (e.g., PDFs) — and can extract insights from all of them using the same workflow engine.

Glyph: End-to-end automation for meetings, sales calls, support tickets, interviews, legal reviews, soap notes and more — complete with full transcripts and AI-generated insights.

Glyph is priced for teams and heavy users who need automation and scale. While Turboscribe is more affordable for basic transcription, Glyph delivers significantly more value with bulk processing, insight extraction, and trend analysis included. The standard plan start for the same price as turboscribe at $20 per month.

If you only need a basic transcript, Turboscribe works. But if you want to save time, uncover trends, automate workflows, and pull insights from transcripts, Glyph is the better fit — especially for teams and growing operations.